There Must Be Consistency~ Corporations Are People Or Not!
The
current issue before the U.S. Supreme Court involves the question as to whether
corporations are people entitled to religious freedom with the right to opt out
of certain provisions of the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) a/k/a Obama Care. This article will not comment on the
constitutionality of the ACA or my personal opinion regarding its
implementation. The fact is, the ACA was passed by Congress and is being
implemented. Critics should just accept
that as fact and move on.
My
critique is the whole dispute as to whether corporations qualify as people. The
answer should be either an unqualified “yes” or an unqualified “no”. It should
not situational. The Court should not pick and choose which Amendments to the
Constitution will identify corporations as people and which will not.
Consistency is the key to legal authority.
In
Citizens United, the Supreme Court made the unfortunately flawed decision that
corporations are people. In this instance, the Court must either decide in
favor of Hobby Lobby and deem that Hobby Lobby as a corporation is a person
with the right to exercise religious freedom and rule that the corporation has
no duty to provide health care services that its religious beliefs find
abhorrent, or overturn Citizens United- realize the error of its ways – and
find that allowing corporations to contribute to political campaigns as people
actually fosters corruption and the ability of corporations to unduly influence
elections.
What
will these 9 justices do? We as the American public rely upon the checks and
balances of the Supreme Court to prevent the executive and legislative branches
from overstepping their bounds. However, the individuals that make up the
Supreme Court bring their individual political preferences and prejudices to
the bench. Perhaps these 9 justices should reflect upon the prior errors of the
Court such as the Dredd Scott decision and Plessy v. Ferguson and reconsider
Citizens United. It is either that or allow Hobby Lobby to deny benefits
legislated by the ACA to its employees.
No comments:
Post a Comment